[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nicholas Wertzberger updated LOG4J2-2576:
-----------------------------------------
    Description: 
Tried on at least 2.8.2 and 2.11.2, the jmx mbeans normally available disappear 
if using log4j2 as the JCL logging manager. Is this on purpose? Does it have to 
be this way? Using the java.util.logging mbeans for "setLoggerLevel" don't 
appear to work on log4j2 loggers, either.

 

To recreate, start up any app with log4j2 logging, specifying 
-Djava.util.logging.manager=org

  was:Tried on at least 2.8.2 and 2.11.2, the jmx mbeans normally available 
disappear if using log4j2 as the JCL logging manager. Is this on purpose? Does 
it have to be this way? Using the java.util.logging mbeans for "setLoggerLevel" 
don't appear to work on log4j2 loggers, either.


> JMX MBeans go away if using 
> -Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.logging.log4j.jul.LogManager
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-2576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2576
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.2, 2.11.2
>            Reporter: Nicholas Wertzberger
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Tried on at least 2.8.2 and 2.11.2, the jmx mbeans normally available 
> disappear if using log4j2 as the JCL logging manager. Is this on purpose? 
> Does it have to be this way? Using the java.util.logging mbeans for 
> "setLoggerLevel" don't appear to work on log4j2 loggers, either.
>  
> To recreate, start up any app with log4j2 logging, specifying 
> -Djava.util.logging.manager=org



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to