sdedic commented on a change in pull request #3316:
URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/3316#discussion_r749230138
##########
File path:
groovy/groovy.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/groovy/editor/completion/KeywordCompletion.java
##########
@@ -98,6 +110,27 @@ public boolean complete(Map<Object, CompletionProposal>
proposals, CompletionCon
return true;
}
+ boolean isFirstStatement(final CompletionContext request) {
+ TokenSequence<GroovyTokenId> ts =
LexUtilities.getGroovyTokenSequence(request.doc, 1);
+
+ if (ts != null) {
+ ts.move(request.lexOffset);
+ if (ts.movePrevious()) {
+ while (ts.isValid() && ts.movePrevious() && ts.offset() >= 0) {
+ Token<GroovyTokenId> t = ts.token();
+ if (!(t.id() == GroovyTokenId.NLS || t.id() ==
GroovyTokenId.WHITESPACE
Review comment:
This could be moved off to some utilities a a
`Predicate<Token<GroovyTokenId>>` as I fear that whitespace-traversing code is
on many places and does not take all the WS/comment tokens into account (see
for example the package name back traversal code in this PR).
Edit: correction - there's some support already: see
[findPreviousNonWsNonComment](https://github.com/apache/netbeans/blob/a5302866a02a0a5db189a07429b56213424d56dd/groovy/groovy.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/groovy/editor/api/lexer/LexUtilities.java#L767),
so maybe `SH_COMMENT` and `SL_COMMENT` the whitespace set should be added to
the WS set there ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
