asbachb commented on PR #6212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/6212#issuecomment-1648466392

   Interestingly the spec mention the namespace change as "new feature" and not 
as "backwards incompatible" or breaking change.
   
   I still think from a functional standpoint the question if 4.0 is compatible 
with 3.2 the answer is yes. From a technical standpoint it might be a "kind of".
   
   The question about which namespace is used I'd consider as a technical one 
and the question if for example a remote ejb needs an interface a functional 
one.
   
   Currently to answer both questions there's only one class. Maybe that's the 
reason for the argument?
   
   
   
   25 Jul 2023 02:48:02 Matthias Bläsing ***@***.***>:
   
   > 
   > I think the versioning is sane: EJB 4 is a breaking change and thus 
deserves to to be treated differently. From an IDE perspective, you have to 
check all generated code as both XML, as the package namespaces were changed. 
What more should change, that warrents calling it an incompatible change?
   > 
   > I accept, that for humans EJB 4 is more or less EJB 3, but from an 
technical perspective they are different.
   > 
   > When I ask the question "Is EJB 3.2 supported?" and I get a "yeah sure", 
then I would generate code relying on the *javax.** namespace and IMHO I would 
be rightfully expect it to work. Yet an EJB 4 server can validly reject that 
code as it does not need to implement it, as it only claims to support EJB 4.
   > 
   > —
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on 
GitHub[https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/6212#issuecomment-1648431780], 
or 
unsubscribe[https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALKAEFFHBPLPF2EW3LBBS3XR27OFANCNFSM6AAAAAA2NJZIDU].
   > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.[Tracking 
image][https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AALKAEBBKWDIJ4OBR7BTY5DXR27OFA5CNFSM6AAAAAA2NJZIDWWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTTCIEJKI.gif]
   > 
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to