lahodaj opened a new pull request, #9130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/9130
While applying the TestNG->JUnit conversion, it turned out comments are
sometimes duplicated. After some debugging, it happens if given code like:
```
class C {
int f = 0; //trailing
//preceding
@Deprecated void t() {}
}
```
the comments are mapped for the `@Deprecated` (or mapped for the
`@Deprecated` before other important mappings). The code will try to map the
comments for the whole method, but as a consequence, it will assign the
`//trailing` to the method as well. And when if the modifiers are changed, the
comment may be duplicated.
The proposed change here is to do a "dry run" on the comment assignment for
the preceding member, which should consume the trailing comment, and make sure
the comments are assigned properly.
I tried some other cases where there are lists of elements, but so far this
seems to only affect class members. If we later find more cases like this, it
should be possible to generalize the handling, but tweaking specifically only
class members seems sufficient for now.
---
**^Add meaningful description above**
<details open>
<summary>Click to collapse/expand PR instructions</summary>
By opening a pull request you confirm that, unless explicitly stated
otherwise, the changes -
- are all your own work, and you have the right to contribute them.
- are contributed solely under the terms and conditions of the Apache
License 2.0 (see section 5 of the license for more information).
Please make sure (eg. `git log`) that all commits have a valid name and
email address for you in the Author field.
If you're a first time contributor, see the Contributing guidelines for more
information.
If you're a committer, please label the PR before pressing "Create pull
request" so that the right test jobs can run.
### PR approval and merge checklist:
1. [ ] Was this PR [correctly
labeled](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=240884239#PRsandYouAreviewerGuide-PRtriggeredCIJobs(conditionalCIpipeline)),
did the right tests run? When did they run?
2. [ ] Is this PR
[squashed](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/git%3A+squash+and+merge)?
3. [ ] Are author name / email address correct? Are
[co-authors](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/committing-changes-to-your-project/creating-and-editing-commits/creating-a-commit-with-multiple-authors#creating-co-authored-commits-on-the-command-line)
correctly listed? Do the commit messages need updates?
3. [ ] Does the PR title and description still fit after the Nth iteration?
Is the description sufficient to appear in the release notes?
If this PR targets the delivery branch: [don't
merge](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Pull+requests+for+delivery).
([full wiki
article](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/PRs+and+You+-+A+reviewer+Guide))
</details>
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
