[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16624640#comment-16624640 ]
Deepak Nigam commented on OFBIZ-10574: -------------------------------------- Added the patch containing ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN and ORDERMGR_CRQ_UPDATE permission data. Thanks, [~deepak.dixit], [~pfm.smits] and [~suraj.khurana] for your inputs. [~suraj.khurana] , I agree with you that the relation type should be 'one' instead of 'one-nofk', but we need to figure out why the type 'one' is used originally. Maybe we need to discuss this thing on the dev mailing list? > 'ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN' permissionId is not defined anywhere > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-10574 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10574 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: order > Affects Versions: Trunk > Reporter: Deepak Nigam > Assignee: Deepak Nigam > Priority: Major > Attachments: OFBiz-10574.patch > > > We have following references for the permissionId 'ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN' in the > OrderDemoData.xml and OrderSecurityPermissionSeedData.xml. > <SecurityGroupPermission fromDate="2001-05-13 12:00:00.0" groupId="FULLADMIN" > permissionId="ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN"/> > <SecurityGroupPermission fromDate="2001-05-13 12:00:00.0" groupId="SUPER" > permissionId="ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN"/> > But the 'SecurityPermission' data for this particular permission is not > defined anywhere. > As the relation type between the entities 'SecurityGroupPermission' and > 'SecurityPermissoin' is 'one-nofk', we are not getting data load error. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)