[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16624640#comment-16624640
]
Deepak Nigam commented on OFBIZ-10574:
--------------------------------------
Added the patch containing ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN and ORDERMGR_CRQ_UPDATE
permission data. Thanks, [~deepak.dixit], [~pfm.smits] and [~suraj.khurana] for
your inputs.
[~suraj.khurana] , I agree with you that the relation type should be 'one'
instead of 'one-nofk', but we need to figure out why the type 'one' is used
originally. Maybe we need to discuss this thing on the dev mailing list?
> 'ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN' permissionId is not defined anywhere
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10574
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10574
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: order
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Deepak Nigam
> Assignee: Deepak Nigam
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: OFBiz-10574.patch
>
>
> We have following references for the permissionId 'ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN' in the
> OrderDemoData.xml and OrderSecurityPermissionSeedData.xml.
> <SecurityGroupPermission fromDate="2001-05-13 12:00:00.0" groupId="FULLADMIN"
> permissionId="ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN"/>
> <SecurityGroupPermission fromDate="2001-05-13 12:00:00.0" groupId="SUPER"
> permissionId="ORDERMGR_CRQ_ADMIN"/>
> But the 'SecurityPermission' data for this particular permission is not
> defined anywhere.
> As the relation type between the entities 'SecurityGroupPermission' and
> 'SecurityPermissoin' is 'one-nofk', we are not getting data load error.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
