[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16625047#comment-16625047
]
Taher Alkhateeb commented on OFBIZ-10307:
-----------------------------------------
I think the refactoring in this case did not achieve the desired results, and
it might look a bit _more_ complex now. Here are a few ideas for things to
clean up if you find them useful:
* Return error or return success could have one location only within the logic
* validation and null checking could be abstracted away behind private methods
to convey what is being attempted without polluting the fucntion with too many
ifs, nested ifs, validations, and null checks
* The try / catch block is buried too deep in conditionals that makes it hard
to test and understand, perhaps it can propagated and handled in one central
location for all errors instead of these multiple returns sprinkled throughout
the code
* Breaking a long function to two functions, with the second function taking
in 4 parameters, which are the same ones passed to the parent function makes
the code actually harder to read and more complex. It's not a matter of
chopping a function to two, but more of specializing the code to what is being
attempted.
This refactoring would make it easier to read the code, and hence test it. So
my recommendation is to revisit the code, and not simply take part of it, cut
it, and paste it into another method.
> Navigate from a domain to another with automated signed in authentication
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10307
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10307
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: framework
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-10307-test from example.patch, OFBIZ-10307-test
> from example.patch, OFBIZ-10307-test from example.patch,
> OFBIZ-10307-test.patch, OFBIZ-10307-test.patch, OFBIZ-10307-test.patch,
> OFBIZ-10307-test.patch, OFBIZ-10307.patch, OFBIZ-10307.patch,
> OFBIZ-10307.patch, OFBIZ-10307.patch, OFBIZ-10307.patch, OFBIZ-10307.patch,
> OFBIZ-10307.patch, OFBIZ-10307.patch
>
>
> This will use a JWT Token authentication to get from one domain, where you
> are signed in, to another domain where you get signed in automatically.
> Something like ExternalLoginKey or Tomcat SSO, but not on the same domain.
> This will build upon the initial work done at OFBIZ-9833 which has been
> partially reverted in trunk with r1827439 (see OFBIZ-10304) and r1827441. I
> explained why and what I did at [https://s.apache.org/a5Km]
> I turned to Ajax for the "Authorization" header sending. I initially thought
> I'd just pass an "Authorization" header and use it in the
> externalServerLoginCheck preprocessor, et voilà.
> But I stumbled upon something I did not know well : CORS! And in particular
> the upstream control (Pre-verified requests):
>
> [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-origin_resource_sharing#Preflight_example]
> [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS]
> [https://www.w3.org/TR/cors/]
> To be able to pass an "Authorization" header, the server must respond
> positively in the Preflight HTTP response (OPTIONS). To do this, either you
> use a Tomcat filter (or your own filter, there are examples on the Net) or
> use HTTPD (or Nginx) configuration on the target server.
> I tried Tomcat first, without success. With HTTPD it's easier just 3 lines.
> For my tests, future tests by OFBiz users and as an example, I asked infra to
> put them in our HTTPD trunk demo config:
> Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "https://localhost:8443";
> Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers "Authorization"
> Header set Access-Control-Allow-Credentials "true"
> No code change (either in all web.xml files for Tomcat or Java for own
> filter), and more safety. It does not give more right to outsiders than what
> we give with the admin credential.
> In Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin you can put more domains. I just
> used [https://localhost:8443|https://localhost:8443/] for the tests.
> It works in Chrome, Firefox and Opera and partially in IE11 (not tested in
> Edge). I did not test Safari, but I guess like other modern browsers it
> should work.
> For those (very few I guess) interested by IE11 (for Edge test yourself and
> report please), here is the solution
>
> [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12643960/internet-explorer-10-is-ignoring-xmlhttprequest-xhr-withcredentials-true]
>
> [https://web.archive.org/web/20130308142134/http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537343%28v=vs.85%29.aspx]
>
> [https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ieinternals/2013/09/17/a-quick-look-at-p3p/]
> TODO (maybe) in the future, use the new Fetch API (not available yet):
> [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Fetch_API]
> ----
> Here is a complement about the way it's architectured:
> # A change to cookies was introduced with OFBIZ-4959. Actually it was not
> really a bug rather a clean-up. The autoLogin cookies were only used by the
> ecommerce component and maybe webpos. But all applications were creating such
> cookies with a one year duration. They were useless until I needed them for
> the feature of this Jira issue. But even if they were safe (httponly) then I
> needed them to be clean, not a one year duration (to be as safe as possible,
> temporary cookies are better). So after doing it crudely, [inspired by
> Taher's suggestion|[https://s.apache.org/qLGC]] I introduced the
> keep-autologin-cookie <webapp> attribute in ofbiz-component.xml. It's used to
> remove not kept cookies when login in or out. So those cookies are only kept
> during a session. Also a cookie is created when an user jumps from one
> application to another on the source domain. These cookies are used when
> navigating from a domain to another to guarantee the safety of the user who
> jumps from the source domain to the target domain. Note that protected
> cookies (httponly) are one of the safer ways to store information, [js script
> can't use
> them|[https://stormpath.com/blog/where-to-store-your-jwts-cookies-vs-html5-web-storage]].
> # To jump from a domain to another I use Ajax to send a JWT token in a HTTP
> header (as recommended by CORS standard). The JWT token contains only the
> userLoginId information.
> # For authentication, I use the checkExternalServerLogin pre-processor in
> the same vein than checkExternalLoginKey. It checks a JWT token is present in
> the HTTP header of the request and if present uses the userLoginId to sign in
> the user on the target domain. I must say that the devil is in the technical
> details (of CORS) and I'll not explain that here.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
