[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16870158#comment-16870158
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-10150:
--------------------------------------
Hi [~je...@thomasnetworks.net],
The patch works. But as you indicated you're migrating from another solution to
OFBiz. In that case you may experience this length issue with more id fields.
If so, you may consider adjusting the length of the 'id' field type definition.
> supplierProductId Should Have Consistent Types Across Entities.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10150
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10150
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: order, product
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Environment: all
> Reporter: jesse thomas
> Assignee: Rohit Hukkeri
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-10150.patch
>
>
> During some data migration I hit an issue where my data for supplierProductId
> was too long. So I looked up the fields and noticed that the order item
> entity had a different type for the field than the supplier product entity. I
> think it would be a good idea to pick one so the two fields can be treated
> consistently. I would vote for id-long, but I think either way it would be
> good to have them be the same type. There are other fields that have this
> issue too if you are interested?
>
> Thanks!
> applications/datamodel/entitydef/order-entitymodel.xml:
> <entity entity-name="OrderItem".......
> <field name="supplierProductId" type="id-long"></field>
> applications/datamodel/entitydef/product-entitymodel.xml:
> <entity entity-name="SupplierProduct"......
> <field name="supplierProductId" type="id"></field>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
