[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17441272#comment-17441272
 ] 

Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-12371:
-------------------------------------------

There are pros and cons, or rather scenarios that are facilitated by one 
approach and made more difficult by the other, to both ways of interpreting 
PartyRole records.

The current approach, implemented in many ootb applications, as [~mbrohl] has 
pointed out, is to interpret the PartyRole records as all the roles the party 
{*}actually plays{*}.

The other approach, that is the one advocated by [~pierresmits], is to 
interpret the PartyRole records as the roles the party {*}can play{*}.

 

> BudgetRole: improbable selection possible, PartyRole gets created
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-12371
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12371
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: accounting
>    Affects Versions: Trunk, 18.12.01
>            Reporter: Pierre Smits
>            Assignee: Pierre Smits
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: roles
>
> On the BudgetRole page (see 
> [https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/accounting/control/BudgetRoles?budgetId=DemoBudget001)]
>  an improbable combination of Party and Role can be set and submitted. 
> Leading to PartyRole record being created.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to