[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17813959#comment-17813959
 ] 

Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-10194:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Michael,

Should this not be backported?

> ContentWrapper empty string result breaks simple FTL null check and default 
> syntax
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-10194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10194
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: content, order, party, product
>    Affects Versions: 16.11.04
>            Reporter: Martin Becker
>            Assignee: Michael Brohl
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>         Attachments: OFBiz-10194_ContentWrappers.patch
>
>
> Since the changes to the ContentWrappers from Ticket OFBIZ-6701 the result 
> for non existing content is an empty string instead of NULL.
> Aside from my opinion, that this is generally a bad design preferred by those 
> who do not like to check for null values within their code, this behavior 
> breaks the simple FTL syntax for using an alternate (default) value for a non 
> existing content, retrieved by a ContentWrapper like this:
> {code:java}
> <#assign categoryName = categoryContentWrapper.get("CATEGORY_NAME", 
> "string")!category.internalName?default(category.productCategoryId) />{code}
> Basically this was done to get the non-existing-content cached within the 
> *.content.rendered cache and let the simple condition 
> {code:java}
> if (cachedValue != null){code}
> after a cache.get() respect this empty value. With a simple change to the 
> condition to
> {code:java}
> if (cachedValue != null || cache.containsKey(cacheKey)){code}
> it is also possible to cache and successfully retrieve NULL values from the 
> cache.
> I observed this now during an upgrade of OFBiz 12 based application code to 
> the current OFBiz release.
> Besides this I did following refactorings consistently for all ContentWrapper 
> implementations to reduce code redundancy:
> * centralized default mimeTypeId retrieval (static Interface method in 
> ContentWrapper)
> * centralized encoding of result string via UtilEncoder (static Interface 
> method in ContentWrapper)
> * centralized/generalized candidate field value retrieval (static Interface 
> method in ContentWrapper)
> * harmonized content cache name to „xyz.content.rendered“, some wrappers did 
> not use the „.rendered“ suffix in their cache name
> * fixed some missing useCache parameter use in EntityQuery…cache()… calls
> For Category and Product ContentWrapper I updated the parameter handling of 
> the central getXyzContentAsText method where both, productId and product 
> GenericValue are given but no check is performed, if both are matching if 
> both are given (bad parameter signature, by the way). Now the product GV is 
> looked up, if a productId is given, and the productId is used from a given 
> product GV always, not only if it is missing. The drawback is, that there 
> will always be a lookup for Product/ProductCategory GV, even if a content 
> entry could be found with the productId/productCategoryId only. On the other 
> hand, the GV is always part of the content rendering input context, currently 
> it is missing there, if only a ID is given as parameter, again not really 
> consistent.
> I did not wanted to change this for all content wrappers directly before 
> getting a feedback for it, even if it would be more consistent to have a 
> content rendering context with a product GV as input, independent of the 
> original call parameters productId and/or product GV.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to