wu-sheng commented on a change in pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking-banyandb/pull/2#discussion_r637754204
########## File path: api/fbs/v1/query.fbs ########## @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +// Licensed to Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor +// license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with +// this work for additional information regarding copyright +// ownership. Apache Software Foundation (ASF) licenses this file to you under +// the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may +// not use this file except in compliance with the License. +// You may obtain a copy of the License at +// +// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +// +// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +// software distributed under the License is distributed on an +// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +// specific language governing permissions and limitations +// under the License. + +namespace v1; + +enum BinaryOp: byte { + EQ, + NE, + LT, + GT, + LE, + GE, + HAVING, + NOT_HAVING, + RANGE +} + +table ByteValue { + value: [ubyte]; +} + +table Tag { + key: [ubyte]; + values: [ByteValue]; Review comment: Let's focus on https://github.com/apache/skywalking-banyandb/pull/2#issuecomment-846840742 first. Keep our design consistent. I feel we are facing big mismatch. And byte as value(array or not) is very dangerous, bytes type is not good at term or accurate matching, but we need that. Because byte means no encoding mechanism, we have no idea how to increase the query performance. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
