wu-sheng commented on PR #12109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/12109#issuecomment-2059417259

   > ` - VIRTUAL_MQ -> ACTIVEMQ` may have to check `cluster` mode, rather than 
single node. if client connected by 
`failover:(tcp://amq1:61616,tcp://amq2:61617)`, it may hard to continue service 
hierarchy.
   
   How could this be in k8s? I think K8s should be DNS oriented right? Even 
with a cluster, client should use service address like 
`activemq-svr.namespace.cluster`.
   
   VM deployment is complex, we are hard to make service hierarchy working in 
that deployment out-of-box.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@skywalking.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to