detjensrobert opened a new issue, #42876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/42876

   ### Bug description
   
   The structured database credentials introduced in 
https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/41777 only allow for static values, and 
have no mechanism to load the password value from a secret. This breaks any 
workflow that only places database credentials as a secret only, such as CNPG 
or AWS RDS cluster integration. 
   
   This also was a problem with the previous credentials under supersetNode, 
but I have only encountered this now as I switched to an external database with 
the Superset V6 upgrade.
   
   I have partially worked around this by specifying an additional 
`envFromSecrets:` entry, which worked for the application container but is not 
passed in to the init `wait-for-postgres` job and that still fails in a loop 
with the stub password entry in the values.
   
   
   ### Screenshots/recordings
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Superset version
   
   6.1.0
   
   ### Python version
   
   Not applicable
   
   ### Node version
   
   Not applicable
   
   ### Browser
   
   Not applicable
   
   ### Additional context
   
   This is using the latest released version of the chart, 0.22.4. 
   
   ### Checklist
   
   - [x] I have searched Superset docs and Slack and didn't find a solution to 
my problem.
   - [x] I have searched the GitHub issue tracker and didn't find a similar bug 
report.
   - [x] I have checked Superset's logs for errors and if I found a relevant 
Python stacktrace, I included it here as text in the "additional context" 
section.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to