codeant-ai-for-open-source[bot] commented on code in PR #44892:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/44892#discussion_r4165236784


##########
superset/commands/deletion_retention/purge_policy.py:
##########
@@ -860,7 +867,74 @@ def declare(
             cleanup_permission=cleanup_dataset_permission,
         ),
     }
-    return validate_unique_root_policies(registry.values())
+    return tuple(registry.values())
+
+
+def _host_purge_policies() -> tuple[PurgeEntityPolicy, ...]:
+    """Return the purge policies a host installed for its own roots.
+
+    A host distribution can carry ``SoftDeleteMixin`` entities this package
+    cannot import. The retention task discovers those entities through the
+    mixin registry, so without a policy they reach the cascade as an
+    unsupported model. The host therefore declares their purge behavior and
+    installs it under ``PURGE_POLICIES_FUNC``.
+
+    Host boundary: an unavailable provider, a malformed payload, or a policy
+    that collides with a root declared here is logged and dropped. A broken
+    host declaration must not take the scheduled purge down with it, and must
+    never redefine how a chart, dashboard or dataset is purged.
+    """
+    if not has_app_context():
+        return ()
+    provider: Callable[[], Any] | None = current_app.config.get(
+        HOST_POLICIES_CONFIG_KEY
+    )
+    if provider is None:
+        return ()
+    try:
+        provided: Any = provider()
+    except Exception:  # pylint: disable=broad-except
+        logger.exception(
+            "purge_policy: %s is unavailable; keeping built-in roots only",
+            HOST_POLICIES_CONFIG_KEY,
+        )
+        return ()
+    if not isinstance(provided, (list, tuple)) or not all(
+        isinstance(policy, PurgeEntityPolicy) for policy in provided
+    ):
+        logger.error(
+            "purge_policy: %s returned %s; expected a sequence of 
PurgeEntityPolicy",
+            HOST_POLICIES_CONFIG_KEY,
+            type(provided).__name__,
+        )
+        return ()
+    builtin_roots: frozenset[type[Any]] = frozenset(
+        policy.model for policy in _builtin_purge_policies()
+    )
+    accepted: list[PurgeEntityPolicy] = []
+    for policy in provided:
+        if policy.model in builtin_roots:
+            logger.error(
+                "purge_policy: host policy for built-in root %s ignored",
+                policy.model.__name__,
+            )
+            continue
+        accepted.append(policy)
+    return tuple(accepted)

Review Comment:
   **Suggestion:** Duplicate policies for the same non-built-in model reach 
`validate_unique_root_policies`, which raises and aborts the scheduled purge 
instead of ignoring the broken host declaration.
   
   **Assessment:** ๐ŸŸ  `Major` ยท ๐Ÿ” `Occurrence: Rarely` ยท ๐Ÿท๏ธ `Logic error`
   
   [![Use CodeAnt 
Skill](https://new-codeant-butcket.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/badges/use-codeant-skill-flat-v2.svg)](https://docs.codeant.ai/cli/resolve-pr-comments-skill)
 [![Fix in 
Cursor](https://new-codeant-butcket.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/badges/fix-in-cursor-flat.svg)](https://app.codeant.ai/fix-in-ide?tool=cursor&prompt_id=808969e2817b461da13c5cb54c45ca1c&service=github&base_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&org=apache&repo=apache%2Fsuperset)
 [![Fix in VSCode 
Claude](https://new-codeant-butcket.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/badges/fix-in-vscode-claude-flat.svg)](https://app.codeant.ai/fix-in-ide?tool=vscode-claude&prompt_id=808969e2817b461da13c5cb54c45ca1c&service=github&base_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&org=apache&repo=apache%2Fsuperset)
   <details>
   <summary><b>Prompt for AI Agent ๐Ÿค– </b></summary>
   
   ```mdx
   This is a comment left during a code review.
   
   **Path:** superset/commands/deletion_retention/purge_policy.py
   **Line:** 922:923
   **Comment:**
        *Logic Error: Duplicate policies for the same non-built-in model reach 
`validate_unique_root_policies`, which raises and aborts the scheduled purge 
instead of ignoring the broken host declaration.
   
   Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve 
this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
   Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask 
user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes, 
then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix
   ```
   </details>
   <a 
href='https://app.codeant.ai/feedback?pr_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fsuperset%2Fpull%2F44892&comment_hash=4590511b397b26bbbd9d8ed38649f93887d2a3558e85b8596112ae006a3d8ec7&reaction=like'>๐Ÿ‘</a>
 | <a 
href='https://app.codeant.ai/feedback?pr_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fsuperset%2Fpull%2F44892&comment_hash=4590511b397b26bbbd9d8ed38649f93887d2a3558e85b8596112ae006a3d8ec7&reaction=dislike'>๐Ÿ‘Ž</a>



##########
superset/commands/deletion_retention/purge_policy.py:
##########
@@ -860,7 +867,74 @@ def declare(
             cleanup_permission=cleanup_dataset_permission,
         ),
     }
-    return validate_unique_root_policies(registry.values())
+    return tuple(registry.values())
+
+
+def _host_purge_policies() -> tuple[PurgeEntityPolicy, ...]:
+    """Return the purge policies a host installed for its own roots.
+
+    A host distribution can carry ``SoftDeleteMixin`` entities this package
+    cannot import. The retention task discovers those entities through the
+    mixin registry, so without a policy they reach the cascade as an
+    unsupported model. The host therefore declares their purge behavior and
+    installs it under ``PURGE_POLICIES_FUNC``.
+
+    Host boundary: an unavailable provider, a malformed payload, or a policy
+    that collides with a root declared here is logged and dropped. A broken
+    host declaration must not take the scheduled purge down with it, and must
+    never redefine how a chart, dashboard or dataset is purged.
+    """
+    if not has_app_context():
+        return ()
+    provider: Callable[[], Any] | None = current_app.config.get(
+        HOST_POLICIES_CONFIG_KEY
+    )
+    if provider is None:
+        return ()
+    try:
+        provided: Any = provider()
+    except Exception:  # pylint: disable=broad-except
+        logger.exception(
+            "purge_policy: %s is unavailable; keeping built-in roots only",
+            HOST_POLICIES_CONFIG_KEY,
+        )
+        return ()
+    if not isinstance(provided, (list, tuple)) or not all(
+        isinstance(policy, PurgeEntityPolicy) for policy in provided
+    ):
+        logger.error(
+            "purge_policy: %s returned %s; expected a sequence of 
PurgeEntityPolicy",
+            HOST_POLICIES_CONFIG_KEY,
+            type(provided).__name__,
+        )
+        return ()
+    builtin_roots: frozenset[type[Any]] = frozenset(
+        policy.model for policy in _builtin_purge_policies()
+    )
+    accepted: list[PurgeEntityPolicy] = []
+    for policy in provided:
+        if policy.model in builtin_roots:
+            logger.error(
+                "purge_policy: host policy for built-in root %s ignored",
+                policy.model.__name__,
+            )
+            continue
+        accepted.append(policy)
+    return tuple(accepted)
+
+
+def purge_policy_registry() -> Mapping[type[Any], PurgeEntityPolicy]:
+    """Index the built-in purge roots plus any the host installed.
+
+    Uncached on purpose, unlike its two inputs: the built-in declarations are
+    built once per process, while a host policy is resolved per call so a
+    provider installed after the first purge is still honored. The hot path is
+    ``get_purge_policy``, which caches per model, so rebuilding this small
+    index is not on it.
+    """
+    return validate_unique_root_policies(
+        (*_builtin_purge_policies(), *_host_purge_policies())
+    )

Review Comment:
   **Suggestion:** The cached resolver can keep an earlier host policy after 
the provider changes, so newly installed or replacement policies are not 
honored by `get_purge_policy`.
   
   **Assessment:** ๐ŸŸ  `Major` ยท ๐Ÿ” `Occurrence: Rarely` ยท ๐Ÿท๏ธ `Cache`
   
   [![Use CodeAnt 
Skill](https://new-codeant-butcket.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/badges/use-codeant-skill-flat-v2.svg)](https://docs.codeant.ai/cli/resolve-pr-comments-skill)
 [![Fix in 
Cursor](https://new-codeant-butcket.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/badges/fix-in-cursor-flat.svg)](https://app.codeant.ai/fix-in-ide?tool=cursor&prompt_id=27b05162e10c47019893d9862974becf&service=github&base_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&org=apache&repo=apache%2Fsuperset)
 [![Fix in VSCode 
Claude](https://new-codeant-butcket.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/badges/fix-in-vscode-claude-flat.svg)](https://app.codeant.ai/fix-in-ide?tool=vscode-claude&prompt_id=27b05162e10c47019893d9862974becf&service=github&base_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&org=apache&repo=apache%2Fsuperset)
   <details>
   <summary><b>Prompt for AI Agent ๐Ÿค– </b></summary>
   
   ```mdx
   This is a comment left during a code review.
   
   **Path:** superset/commands/deletion_retention/purge_policy.py
   **Line:** 935:937
   **Comment:**
        *Cache: The cached resolver can keep an earlier host policy after the 
provider changes, so newly installed or replacement policies are not honored by 
`get_purge_policy`.
   
   Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve 
this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
   Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask 
user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes, 
then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix
   ```
   </details>
   <a 
href='https://app.codeant.ai/feedback?pr_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fsuperset%2Fpull%2F44892&comment_hash=11f9bf4c02ff008c3a6869668fa6dabf2ef9f4096ac0b56a61e5b49703340462&reaction=like'>๐Ÿ‘</a>
 | <a 
href='https://app.codeant.ai/feedback?pr_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fsuperset%2Fpull%2F44892&comment_hash=11f9bf4c02ff008c3a6869668fa6dabf2ef9f4096ac0b56a61e5b49703340462&reaction=dislike'>๐Ÿ‘Ž</a>



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to