Yicong-Huang commented on code in PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/4770#discussion_r3177781041
########## amber/src/test/scala/org/apache/texera/amber/engine/architecture/scheduling/RegionPlanSpec.scala: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.texera.amber.engine.architecture.scheduling + +import org.apache.texera.amber.core.executor.OpExecInitInfo +import org.apache.texera.amber.core.virtualidentity.{ + ExecutionIdentity, + OperatorIdentity, + PhysicalOpIdentity, + WorkflowIdentity +} +import org.apache.texera.amber.core.workflow.{ + GlobalPortIdentity, + PhysicalLink, + PhysicalOp, + PortIdentity +} +import org.scalatest.flatspec.AnyFlatSpec + +class RegionPlanSpec extends AnyFlatSpec { + + private def physicalOpId(opId: String): PhysicalOpIdentity = + PhysicalOpIdentity(OperatorIdentity(opId), "main") + + private def op(opId: String): PhysicalOp = + PhysicalOp( + physicalOpId(opId), + WorkflowIdentity(0), + ExecutionIdentity(0), + OpExecInitInfo.Empty + ) + + private def link(fromOp: String, toOp: String): PhysicalLink = + PhysicalLink(physicalOpId(fromOp), PortIdentity(0), physicalOpId(toOp), PortIdentity(0)) + + private def globalPort(opId: String): GlobalPortIdentity = + GlobalPortIdentity(physicalOpId(opId), PortIdentity(0), input = true) + + "RegionPlan.getRegion" should "return the region with the given id" in { + val r0 = Region(RegionIdentity(0), Set(op("a")), Set.empty) + val r1 = Region(RegionIdentity(1), Set(op("b")), Set.empty) + val plan = RegionPlan(Set(r0, r1), Set.empty) + + assert(plan.getRegion(RegionIdentity(0)) == r0) + assert(plan.getRegion(RegionIdentity(1)) == r1) + } + + it should "throw NoSuchElementException for an unknown region id" in { + val plan = RegionPlan(Set(Region(RegionIdentity(0), Set(op("a")), Set.empty)), Set.empty) + assertThrows[NoSuchElementException] { + plan.getRegion(RegionIdentity(99)) + } + } + + "RegionPlan.getRegionOfLink" should "return the region whose physicalLinks include the link" in { + val ab = link("a", "b") Review Comment: hhh please dramatically increase the plan complexity. I do believe region plan test can only be meaningful when we have large and complex plans. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
