aglinxinyuan opened a new pull request, #6311: URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/6311
### What changes were proposed in this PR? Adds a unit test that drives the real `JumpToOperatorRegionHandler.jumpToOperatorRegion` (the existing scheduling spec only exercises a private mirror of the logic). It seeds a multi-level `Schedule` on a real `CoordinatorProcessor` and asserts the schedule cursor jumps for an existing operator and is a no-op for a non-existent one. ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions? Closes #6308. Part of the amber unit-test coverage effort toward 80% ([Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera)). ### How was this PR tested? Added a new `JumpToOperatorRegionHandlerSpec` (2 cases), a plain-JVM `AnyFlatSpec` — no ActorSystem needed. Verified locally on Java 17 (`WorkflowExecutionService/testOnly`, plus `scalafixAll --check` clean). Test-only change — no production code is modified. ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8 [1M context]) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
