aglinxinyuan opened a new pull request, #7019: URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/7019
### What changes were proposed in this PR? Extends three pyamber suites and adds two new test files. No source changes. - **`core/storage/runnables/input_port_materialization_reader_runnable.py`** (~83% covered): extended over the uncovered branches. - **`core/architecture/packaging/input_manager.py`** (~88% covered, **no dedicated test**): new test file. - **`core/models/tuple.py`** (~95% covered) and **`pytexera/udf/udf_operator.py`** (~94% covered): extended. - **`core/storage/model/virtual_document.py`** (~74% covered, **no dedicated test**): new test file. Tests are hermetic and deterministic — no real sleeps, nothing left running. ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions? Closes #7017. ### How was this PR tested? `python -m pytest` over the five files -> 187 passed. (`TestTuple::test_hash` is deselected locally: it fails identically on unmodified `main` under Windows because `tuple.py` calls `datetime.timestamp()`, which raises `OSError [Errno 22]` there; it passes on the Linux CI runners.) `ruff format --check` + `ruff check` clean. ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8 [1M context]) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
