notifications  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [I] Restore commented-out mouse-event tests in workflow-editor.component.spec.ts [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Restore commented-out mouse-event tests in workflow-editor.component.spec.ts [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Restore commented-out mouse-event tests in workflow-editor.component.spec.ts [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for InputManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for InputManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for InputManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for InputManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for InputManager [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for OperatorExecution and RegionExecution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for OperatorExecution and RegionExecution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for OperatorExecution and RegionExecution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for OperatorExecution and RegionExecution [texera] via GitHub
• [I] add unit test coverage for InputManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for InputManager [texera] via GitHub
• [I] add unit test coverage for OperatorExecution and RegionExecution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for OperatorExecution and RegionExecution [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster [texera] via GitHub
• [I] add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster (Empty / VFS / Sequential) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for record-storage cluster (Empty / VFS / Sequential) [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Schema preview and starter pipelines in CSV File Scan property pane [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Schema preview and starter pipelines in CSV File Scan property pane [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Card View to Workflows [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for dashboard/hub entity model [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] add unit test coverage for dashboard/hub entity model [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(deploy): add LiteLLM proxy helm chart support for AI agent integration [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(frontend): use default import for package.json version in dev build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): use default import for package.json version in dev build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): use default import for package.json version in dev build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): use default import for package.json version in dev build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): use default import for package.json version in dev build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): use default import for package.json version in dev build [texera] via GitHub
• [I] frontend dev build fails: named import of version from package.json [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] frontend dev build fails: named import of version from package.json [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Remove unused hocon-parser / hoconjs dependencies and type stub from pyright-language-service [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove unused hocon-parser / hoconjs dependencies and type stub from pyright-language-service [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove unused hocon-parser / hoconjs dependencies and type stub from pyright-language-service [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove unused hocon-parser / hoconjs dependencies and type stub from pyright-language-service [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for StatisticsManager + SerializationManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for StatisticsManager + SerializationManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for StatisticsManager + SerializationManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for StatisticsManager + SerializationManager [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for StatisticsManager + SerializationManager [texera] via GitHub
• [I] add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for LogicalPlan [texera] via GitHub
• [I] add unit test coverage for worker manager classes (StatisticsManager + SerializationManager) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for worker manager classes (StatisticsManager + SerializationManager) [texera] via GitHub
• [I] add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for ClientEvent sealed-trait family [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] 改进 hocon-parser 模块的类型定义，使用更精确的类型替代 any [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Flaky test: test_delete_object_failure_is_swallowed fails on Python 3.12.13 CI runners [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(amber): use generated OperatorPortExecutionsDao instead of a hand-written helper [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(amber): use generated OperatorPortExecutionsDao instead of a hand-written helper [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(amber): persist operator port result URIs through a ClientEvent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(amber): persist operator port result URIs through a ClientEvent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(amber): persist operator port result URIs through a ClientEvent [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(auth): enforce @RolesAllowed in file-service by registering RolesAllowedDynamicFeature [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): enforce @RolesAllowed in file-service by registering RolesAllowedDynamicFeature [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): enforce @RolesAllowed in file-service by registering RolesAllowedDynamicFeature [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): enforce @RolesAllowed in file-service by registering RolesAllowedDynamicFeature [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): enforce @RolesAllowed in file-service by registering RolesAllowedDynamicFeature [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): enforce @RolesAllowed in file-service by registering RolesAllowedDynamicFeature [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): enforce @RolesAllowed in file-service by registering RolesAllowedDynamicFeature [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Authorization bypass: @RolesAllowed unenforced on microservices, workflow-compiling-service requires no token at all [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Authorization bypass: @RolesAllowed unenforced on file-service (DatasetResource) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Authorization bypass: @RolesAllowed unenforced on file-service (DatasetResource) [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Move cluster-induced workflow shutdown from engine into web [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Introduce engine event proto and replace direct WebSocket pushes from engine [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Extract PveResolver from web's PveManager into common/config [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Move WorkflowExecutionsResource.insertOperatorPortResultUri into a DAO [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Migrate amber/web sources from javax to jakarta namespace [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Replace dropwizard-websockets with Jakarta WebSocket on Jetty 11 [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Move amber/web onto the in-house JwtAuthFilter [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Drop the three unmaintained Dropwizard 1.x bundles in amber/web [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Refactor amber engine to stop depending on amber/web internals [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Upgrade amber/web from Dropwizard 1.3.23 to 4.0.7 [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add unit tests for ReservoirSamplingOpExec [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: keep failed-upload cleanup inside the upload worker [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: keep failed-upload cleanup inside the upload worker [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: keep failed-upload cleanup inside the upload worker [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Replace the LiteLLM HTTP proxy in access-control-service with a direct frontend → LiteLLM flow [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(auth): require REGULAR/ADMIN role on LiteLLM proxy endpoints [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): require REGULAR/ADMIN role on LiteLLM proxy endpoints [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): require REGULAR/ADMIN role on LiteLLM proxy endpoints [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): require REGULAR/ADMIN role on LiteLLM proxy endpoints [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): require REGULAR/ADMIN role on LiteLLM proxy endpoints [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): require REGULAR/ADMIN role on LiteLLM proxy endpoints [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] JwtAuthFilter: switch to eager 401 on missing/invalid token, opt-out via @PermitAll [texera] via GitHub
• [I] LiteLLM proxy endpoints accept anonymous requests when Copilot is enabled [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] LiteLLM proxy endpoints accept anonymous requests when Copilot is enabled [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(auth): make JwtAuthFilter eager-401 with @PermitAll opt-out [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): make JwtAuthFilter eager-401 with @PermitAll opt-out [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): make JwtAuthFilter eager-401 with @PermitAll opt-out [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(auth): make JwtAuthFilter eager-401 with @PermitAll opt-out [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: scope large binary storage and cleanup by execution id [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope large binary storage and cleanup by execution id [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope large binary storage and cleanup by execution id [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope large binary storage and cleanup by execution id [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope large binary storage and cleanup by execution id [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope large binary storage and cleanup by execution id [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope large binary storage and cleanup by execution id [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope large binary storage and cleanup by execution id [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(ci): add stale workflow to auto-close inactive PRs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): add stale workflow to auto-close inactive PRs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): add stale workflow to auto-close inactive PRs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): add stale workflow to auto-close inactive PRs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): add stale workflow to auto-close inactive PRs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): add stale workflow to auto-close inactive PRs [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Auto-close stale pull requests after 90 days of inactivity [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Auto-close stale pull requests after 90 days of inactivity [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add 1.2.0-incubating and 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to the bug-report version dropdown [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Frontend should not attach Authorization header to /api/config/pre-login [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(frontend): exclude /api/config/pre-login from JwtModule [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): exclude /api/config/pre-login from JwtModule [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] ReservoirSamplingOpExec emits null padding tuples [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ReservoirSamplingOpExec emits null padding tuples [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add ReservoirSamplingOpExec spec [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add ReservoirSamplingOpExec spec [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add ReservoirSamplingOpExec spec [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add ReservoirSamplingOpExec spec [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(licensing): auto-generate per-module NOTICE-binary from jars' META-INF/NOTICE [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): auto-generate per-module NOTICE-binary from jars' META-INF/NOTICE [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): auto-generate per-module NOTICE-binary from jars' META-INF/NOTICE [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): auto-generate per-module NOTICE-binary from jars' META-INF/NOTICE [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): auto-generate per-module NOTICE-binary from jars' META-INF/NOTICE [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): auto-generate per-module NOTICE-binary from jars' META-INF/NOTICE [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): add per-module NOTICE-binary generation script and CI checks for detecting NOTICE-binary drifting [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): add per-module NOTICE-binary generation script and CI checks for detecting NOTICE-binary drifting [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): add per-module NOTICE-binary generation script and CI checks for detecting NOTICE-binary drifting [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): add per-module NOTICE-binary generation script and CI checks for detecting NOTICE-binary drifting [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): add per-module NOTICE-binary generation script and CI checks for detecting NOTICE-binary drifting [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): add per-module NOTICE-binary generation script and CI checks for detecting NOTICE-binary drifting [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): add per-module NOTICE-binary generation script and CI checks for detecting NOTICE-binary drifting [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for core executor traits + factory [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] add unit test coverage for core executor traits + factory [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make Python Virtual Environments Persistent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make Python Virtual Environments Persistent [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(workflow-operator): prevent NPE when Sort operator is unconfigured [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(workflow-operator): prevent NPE when Sort operator is unconfigured [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(workflow-operator): prevent NPE when Sort operator is unconfigured [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(workflow-operator): prevent NPE when Sort operator is unconfigured [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(workflow-operator): prevent NPE when Sort operator is unconfigured [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(workflow-operator): prevent NPE when Sort operator is unconfigured [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(workflow-operator): prevent NPE when Sort operator is unconfigured [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Sort operator acting weird when doing editing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Sort operator acting weird when doing editing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Sort operator acting weird when doing editing [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(asf): use raw payload bypass_actors for branch protection [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Migrate Default Branch Protection bypass to raw payload bypass_actors [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: add 1.2.0-incubating and 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to bug-report options [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add 1.2.0-incubating and 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to bug-report options [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add 1.2.0-incubating and 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to bug-report options [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add 1.2.0-incubating and 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to bug-report options [texera] via GitHub

• Later messages