kezhuw opened a new pull request, #2104: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2104
Individual `OpCode.check` will get `UnimplementedException`. JIRA: ZOOKEEPER-2623 Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/vl816jfrklvqz29coz5qnwpom9q41pcg This pr reworks/reverts #1988, which return an empty response for individual `OpCode.check`, for the following reasons: * The individual `OpCode.check` is covered by `OpCode.exists`. * In certain situation, we may want to differentiate the two(individual or not), say statistics. This could cause maintenance burden for us. * Exposing opcode without explicit API is probably not a good. Open this pr for easy evaluation. I will reply the discussion thread for reference. I plan to open a draft backport on branch-3.9 to ease code review if we are willing to go this direction. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@zookeeper.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
