On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:54:16 -0700, Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> wrote: > Finally, I'm a tiny bit annoyed that now after a fresh checkout of > notmuch and "make" that one can't easily run ./notmuch without either > installing the library (or fiddling with LD_LIBRARY_PATH). I've got some > ideas on how to simplify that, but I'm not sure if any are good or worth > it.
That was admittedly a very nice feature. And as I have proposed (but not send any patch :-)). I would argue that a --shared and a --static option (or whatever configure standard policy is for that) would make sense that links notmuch either dynamically or statically. But thanks for doing this work. Much appreciated Sebastian _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
