Excerpts from Tomas Carnecky's message of Mon Apr 12 06:25:23 -0600 2010: > I have a patch which adds support for hooks which are run when tags are > added, removed or new messages added to notmuch. But perhaps the > fork/exec overhead of running the hooks would slow the processing down > too much.
Rather than a fork/exec for every message, why not have a persistent subprocess that receives message IDs (+ filenames?) and can then do arbitrary work and return back the proper tags? _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
