On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:35:44 -0700, Carl Worth <[email protected]> wrote: > [*] I say "should" because I don't believe we have any actual > specification of the data coming out of the JSON output yet. One other > thing that seems odd is the name of "date_unix" in the show output and > "timestamp" in the search output for what is effectively the same > field.
The show output is updated to use `timestamp' in id:[email protected] (just sent). dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
