On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:50:13 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe that Carl pursues an evil plan of converting unsuspicious > mercurial users to git. At least that is what I suspect when he asked > whether it would make sense to get my cnotmuch python bindings into the > notmuch > repo. :-)
Or perhaps Sebastian has an evil plan to dominate the "git shortlog" output for the next release cycle. > Carl, I did not update the .hgignore to be .gitignore yet. I recommend > to just ignore *.pyc and the docs/html dir (just have a look at > .hgignore). As for the directory to stick this in, I don't care. Does > "bindings/python" make sense? Also, I have a debian dir to produce a > .deb package, not sure what to do with that. I went ahead with "bindings/python" yes. For the Debian package, if we can do get "make install" to do the right thing then it's a pretty easy thing to add a section to debian/control and add a could of <package>.install files. If there are any other python-specific packaging tasks we can move them from bindings/python/debian to debian as well. Though that brings up the question of what to name the Debian package for these bindings. A quick "apt-cache search python" suggests that python-notmuch might not be a crazy name. What do you think, Sebastian? -Carl
pgpZij2TcAWcV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
