On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:05:23 +0000, David Edmondson <d...@dme.org> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre <ra...@free.fr> wrote: > > - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is > > boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to > > add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is > > impossible to find. > > I don't understand this at all. You can find messages by searching for > anything about them (sender, subject, body). In what way is it > 'impossible'?
Impossible was a bit strong. But if for instance I hit space in a inboxed mail in a thread with one mail, without taking too much time to study it, then I will know that I forgot to process one mail without knowing which one it is. I used to find such mails by searching for mails without any tags, but this was cumbersome. My present patch is a better attempt to fix this. > Using tags to group things is great, I agree, but coercing me into > adding tags that I don't really need seems strange. It is just a way to ensure that all your mails are properly filed, and file them quickly. Matthieu _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch