On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Carl Worth wrote: > Oh, and one other thing I forgot to mention about the patch. It > currently talks about things along the lines of "git-style tests" and > "cworth-style tests". > > You and I might understand perfectly well what that means now, but we > need the test suite to be independently comprehensible. (I'd like to be > able to understand it myself when I look at it again in the future, > having forgotten the current history.) > > So if you could describe these instead as something like "tests using > test_expect_success" vs. "tests using > test_begin_subtest/test_expect_equal" or something like that, that would > be great.
Hi Carl, I'm sending the fixes to the test suite as responses to this mail. -Michal _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch