On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:28:10 +1000, Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> wrote: > On 30 June 2011 17:50, Pieter Praet <pie...@praet.org> wrote: > > And AFAIK, "Archive" does *not* mark a message as read in GMail. > > (see previous messages suggesting the inverse) > > gmail will mark all messages in the thread as read when looking at any > part of the thread - so in practical terms whenever I click "Archive" > the entire thread is marked as read - as I always click archive in the > message view. > > Not absolutely convinced this is the best approach. I think it is > important to appreciate the differences that different implementations > have chosen.
I was thinking more along the lines of archiving a message from the Inbox (or similar) view, in which the 'unread' state does remain preserved. Marking all messages as read as soon as the thread is opened is a separate issue (and *far* from sensible), but this heavy-handed approach is probably a necessity (as opposed to being a deliberate choice) due to the limitations of its current interface, which Notmuch thankfully doesn't share. > -- > Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch Peace -- Pieter _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
