On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 04:37:56 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:20:40 -0300, David Bremner <brem...@unb.ca> wrote:
> IMHO 1[+2] is the way. It breaks the dump command interface, but would > make it consistent with other commands. Implementing the second option > (for all commands) is nice but independent and optional. Also, perhaps > --output, --output-file or smth would a better name than --write. I'm not fussy about the name, except that --output is taken, and I thought there might be some benefit of making options have unique prefixes. d
pgpZ0QAwIdijG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
