On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:51:01 -0500, Darren McGuicken <mailing-notm...@fernseed.info> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:58:03 -0500, Dan Bryant <dan.bry...@jhuapl.edu> wrote: > > I'd like to report some success on getting S/MIME signature > > verification working using notmuch and the recently-released GMime > > 2.6. I specifically tested with notmuch-0.10.2 and gmime-2.6.1. > > [...] > > > I don't have submittable patches for #2/#3 yet, but I wanted to share > > what I found about the scope of what actually needs to be done, which > > is fairly small. (The biggest blocker is probably that Debian & other > > distros haven't packaged gmime-2.6.) > > Hi Dan, nice find! As another Fedora user I'd be happy to test out any > patches you come up with. > > When you make those changes to the gpg_context are you breaking gpg > signature validation? Or is the one a superset of the other?
The current assumption in notmuch is that all encrypted/signed messages in a mailbox will be using the same crypto algorithm. This is the first thing I want to fix: which crypto algorithm (and therefore, context object) to use should probably be detected by the MIME type of the message part. Dan _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch