What's the general feeling about this approach to producing tests for the emacs UI? (That is, code the test in a .el file and call the relevant function(s) from the test harness.)
It makes it simpler to develop and maintain the test (because you can do more work with traditional emacs support for editing elisp), but might make interpreting failures more difficult (the test harness mostly just reports 'failed').
pgp5uII3DfWKN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
