On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet <pie...@praet.org> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:25 +0000, David Edmondson <d...@dme.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet <pie...@praet.org> wrote: > > > CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into > > > `notmuch', > > > eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind. > > > > The lisp-ier-ness changes are good. > > > > I'm less sure about the functional change. Sometimes I want to go back > > to where I was, other times I want to go to `notmuch-hello'. [...] > > Hmmm, true. The path of least resistance is elusive. > > > [...] I suppose > > that I can replace my binding for `notmuch' with one for > > `notmuch-hello'. > > > > Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with > `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah... >
s/ido-completion-help/ido-completing-read > > Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable. > > > > > FYI: causes 2 compile warnings due to requiring the cl package at runtime. > > > > `cl' is still `eval-when-compile' though - won't that break? > > Haven't noticed any issues here, apart from the complaints @ compilation. > > > Peace > > -- > Pieter Peace -- Pieter _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch