On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:47:38 +0000, David Edmondson <d...@dme.org> wrote: > On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:07:02 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins > <jroll...@finestructure.net> wrote: > > Sorry to be so late on this, but I'm not a big fan of this new feature. > > I would prefer to always see the subject (or any other field for that > > matter) as is. > > The Emacs UI always replaced blank subjects with '[No Subject]' in > buffer names. The printing code also needed something other than a blank > subject for buffer renaming.
I don't much care what the buffer name is. That seems to be a completely different issue to me. > Updating `notmuch-prettify-subject' to use a user configurable string > (that can be set to the empty string) sounds like a good idea. Please > ensure that the various other bits of code that require something other > than a blank subject still work properly. I am actually perfectly happy to see this patch reverted. jamie.
pgp9yN2I2nRZ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
