On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet <pie...@praet.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> wrote: > > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > > > <dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Changes: > > > > > > > > v4: > > > > > > > > * rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review > > > > > > > > > > I pushed this series. > > > > > > Maybe this was discussed already, but I think ideally * would apply only > > > to open messages. So consider that a feature request if someone is > > > looking for a project. > > > > > > > How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it currently does), > > but 'C-u *' only to open messages? That would make more sense IMHO. > > > > But, conforming to your original request, I've implemented the inverse. > > > > I personally do like '*' as is and do not want to change it's behavior. > Though I am not against adding a prefix argument for it. >
Also can you please send new patches (and patch series) in a new separate thread? If they are related to another thread, you can add a reference. But having multiple patch series with multiple versions in a single thread is very confusing IMO. Regards, Dmitry > Regards, > Dmitry > > > Patches follow. > > > > > > > d > > > _______________________________________________ > > > notmuch mailing list > > > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > > > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch > > > > > > Peace > > > > -- > > Pieter _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch