On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:24:29 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/26/2012 11:21 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > > Does it make sense for the cli to canonicalize the content types to > > always be lower case? Or should it continue to just pass the content > > type exactly as it appears in the original message? Given that > > consumers should parse it case insensitively, it maybe doesn't matter, > > but it might also be nice for us to be consistent. > > i think "notmuch emits the content-type in the exact form contained in > the underlying message" is a good flavor of consistency.
Works for me. jamie.
pgpG2n9JgXMB8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
