Quoting Felipe Contreras (2012-04-23 14:36:33) > I don't think this is the right approach. If database_destroy truly > destroys the object, then we would want to do it only at garbage > collection, when it's not accessible any more. What if I want to > re-use the database from the Ruby code? > > This would probably be better: > >[...]
You're probably right, I don't know the ruby bindings at all, I just wanted to preserve the old behavior. You are welcome to refine the ruby bindings later (or maintain them, I *believe* they are unmaintained, the last change was back in october 2011), but let's get this patch series in first. Cheers, Justus _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch