On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:05:41AM +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: > I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I > wonder whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic > i.e. is invading that "namespace". If no one else has the same > feeling (or the feeling is just wrong (or insignificant)) then this > can be forgotten :D
For what it's worth, I don't have any ‘rst-*’ commands on my system. I do have ‘rst2*’ commands, and an ‘rstpep2html.py’. I'm happy to rename to whatever, but rst-man2any.py was the best that I could think of following the texi2any pattern. Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
