"W. Trevor King" <wk...@tremily.us> writes: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:36:10PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> W. Trevor King writes: >> > If we don't have an upstream, there is nothing to merge, so >> > nothing is unmerged. This avoids errors like: >> >> pushed this one patch. > > Without the stderr-catching of something like patch 3, this means > folks without an upstream are going to see a distracting: > > error: No upstream configured for branch 'master' >
On reflection, I don't think that patch made things worse for this use case. So I don't think it really hurts to leave it there for now. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
