On Sun 2015-08-16 21:53:36 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16 2015, David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> wrote: > >> It's becoming a maintenance burden to do anything things with the >> crypto glue code twice, once for 2.4 and once for 2.6. I don't have >> any 2.4 version available to test on my development machine anymore, >> so the 2.4 specific code paths are likely not very well tested. >> --- >> >> I started to rebase the SMIME signature verification patches and got >> aggravated at solving the same conflicts twice in every file. >> >> 2.6.7 is from 2012, so that's a bit newer than some of our >> requirements, but I think not so bad. YMMV. > > Perhaps it is time for me to update to gmime 2.6 in this machine. PITA ;/
Please do, i think gmime 2.4 is really not well-supported upstream any more either. --dkg _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch