On Sun, Aug 30 2015, David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> wrote: > Tomi Ollila <tomi.oll...@iki.fi> writes: > >> The new function notmuch-show-message-resend re-sends >> message to new recipients using #'message-resend. >> >> Recipients are read from minibuffer as a comma-separated >> string (with some keyboard support including tab completion). >> > > I couldn't get the tab completion to work, at least if I go > > M-x notmuch-show-resend-message > > nor when evaluating (notmuch-address-from-minibuffer "foo:") > > Do I need to bind a key to test this?
Nope. both of the above should work -- and worked for me just now (this is how I tested just now: emacs -q -L $PWD/emacs -l emacs/notmuch.el -f notmuch --eval '(progn (setq notmuch-address-command "nottoomuch-addresses.sh") (notmuch-address-message-insinuate))' ) >> I remember that Emacs VM might have had 'b' bound to this functionality >> but I cannot be sure. A few weeks ago I looked gnus, rmail & mh-e to >> figure out whether 'b' would have been bound to similar functionality >> there but I cannot find it... > > mutt uses 'b'. AFAICT, gnus uses some sequence ending in b to resend > bounced messages (i.e. from mailer-daemon). > > quoting the manual: > > S D b > > If you have sent a mail, but the mail was bounced back to you for > some reason (wrong address, transient failure), you can use this > command to resend that bounced mail > (gnus-summary-resend-bounced-mail). [...] > > S D r > > Not to be confused with the previous command, > gnus-summary-resend-message will prompt you for an address to send > the current message off to, and then send it to that place. [...] > > Be that as it may, we already use 'r' for reply, and I'm not sure we > want to go (more) in the way of multi-letter sequences. I agree that we don't want to to multi-letter sequences (early). I personally would be fine w/ 'b'... Tomi _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch