On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:42:08 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> wrote: > Interesting. My only real concern at this point is that some of the new files > have a copyright header identifying Junio as the copyright holder, but > no license information. Meanwhile, the implicit license of git (GPLv2 > only) is incompatible with that of notmuch (GPLv3+).
I'm not lawyer, but I'd say it should be no problem to use GPLv2 test suite to test your GPLv3 application. You are not linking them together. On the other hand, if you want the tests cases to be GPLv3 then you are probably right. Is this the case? Michal
