On Wed, 4 May 2011 21:48:39 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon at mit.edu> wrote: > This is awesome. What was your machine configuration?
Does anyone else have an opinions about this patch? It seems reasonable to me (other than a couple errant comments that were left in and should be removed). It seems worth the slight increase in database size for such a nice performance improvement. Unless I hear a strong positive response I'll hold off on considering it for 0.6, and suggest instead targeting it for 0.7. jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110508/53077df9/attachment.pgp>