On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:49:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:15:22 +0000, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote: > > So to clarify, do you prefer having on/off switches, or just enabling > > this without customization at all? Personally I'd shy away from the > > latter, but I guess it depends on how useful vs. distracting people find > > this. > > My opinion is to just make it a feature without any customization at > all. I can see no harm in having these searches always available.
That should clean up the code a bit as well. Then we're left with picking the sensible names. I just use "other" and "no tags" myself. Do you see value in e.g. surrounding them in brackets like "[other]" and "[no tags]" to signify they are special? Better ideas? I'm not a native speaker... And while at it, how about also making append the non-customizable, IMHO sensible, default for saved searches in patch 2/4? Jani