On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:41:58 +0100, Thomas Jost <schnouki at schnouki.net> wrote: > binutils-2.22 changes the behaviour of ld by defaulting to > --no-copy-dt-needed-entries, which means that required objects/libs are not > "indirectly" linked through intermediate objects/libs anymore. As a > consequence, > when using binutils-2.22, building symbol-test fails with the following error: > > /usr/bin/ld: test/symbol-test.o: undefined reference to symbol > 'std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::~basic_string()@@GLIBCXX_3.4' > > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, > std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()@@GLIBCXX_3.4' is defined in DSO > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 so try adding it to the linker command line > > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: could not read symbols: Invalid operation > > An easy fix is to link using CXX instead of CC. > ---
+1 -- LGTM, Works for me (hits also on Fedora 15). Interesting that gcc does not fully default to g++ behaviour when source file is symbol-test.cc Tomi > Hi there, > > This build issue happens on Arch Linux. For more details, the relevant > binutils > changelog is here: http://ur1.ca/6px8j, and more explanations are available on > the Fedora wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange > (People who read the arch-general ML may want to read the thread starting at > id:"1323458274-sup-9064 at eris".) > > Best regards, > Thomas > > test/Makefile.local | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/Makefile.local b/test/Makefile.local > index 6cb6c82..fa2df73 100644 > --- a/test/Makefile.local > +++ b/test/Makefile.local > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ $(dir)/smtp-dummy: $(smtp_dummy_modules) > $(call quiet,CC) $^ -o $@ > > $(dir)/symbol-test: $(dir)/symbol-test.o > - $(call quiet,CC) $^ -o $@ -Llib -lnotmuch -lxapian > + $(call quiet,CXX) $^ -o $@ -Llib -lnotmuch -lxapian > > .PHONY: test check > > -- > 1.7.8 > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch at notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch >