On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:58:30 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:38:18 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at > finestructure.net> wrote: > > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:32:16 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote: > > > In the search view it does exactly this. > > > > I worry about race conditions in this case, though. I frequently > > archive threads after I've read everything, but I still want to know if > > new message to that thread come in. If I attempt to archive a thread in > > notmuch-search, but a new message has entered the thread without me > > knowing it, I'll archive the new message before I had a chance to look > > at it. > > Just to be clear: The patch in question does not alter this > behaviour. The race you describe is there already. > > And at a glance, it does not look like something that would be trivial > to fix. The buffer does not have the information to do that.
Hmm, I currently run 'notmuch new' from command line... I've been thinking changing that but now knowing this issue I think I'm not going to do that... > BR, > Jani. Tomi