On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:56:29 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at 
finestructure.net> wrote:
> Actually, the show-next argument was already part of the function.  I
> did not introduce it.  And it wasn't optional originally, so if we want
> to change that behavior we should probably do so in a separate patch.

Hrm.  I didn?t communicate as clearly as I could have ? you are correct
that the show-next argument to the notmuch-show-archive-internal function
was pre-existing.  But notmuch-show-tag-thread-internal is a new function,
with potentially expanded usefulness to third-party code.  Thus I think
I?m in the clear to bikeshed about its calling convention.  :) It?s your
patch, though, so it?s your call if you feel that the &optional goes best
in a new change.

-- 
Aaron Ecay

Reply via email to