On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:45:47 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:41:49 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:18:21 +0000, David Edmondson <dme at dme.org> wrote: > > > I have a vague recollection that someone reported a bug where > > > `(window-width)' was not the right value to use if `line-number-mode' is > > > enabled, but I can't find it again now. (Someone should build an email > > > client that allows easy searching.) > > > > Do you perhaps mean this: id:"87k47nlpzb.fsf at nausicaa.localdomain" > > [Now also to the list. Got bitten by my own patch binding 'r' to > reply-to-sender. Perhaps it's really too drastic to change that now...]
Yes, that one. Ivy: Are you likely to add a test and re-submit the patch? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120111/8ee7c6ae/attachment.pgp>