On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:53:39 -0500, Aaron Ecay <ecay at sas.upenn.edu> wrote: > I?m personally of the opinion that notmuch should just say ?the mail > composition facility is provided by message mode (here is the > documentation on customizing it)?.
In general, +1. > One possible step that might ease the transition pain could be for > notmuch?s emacs interface to have a configuration file (similar to > Wanderlust?s ~/.wl; I believe Gnus also uses a ~/.gnus). The idea is > that this file contains elisp code, and is loaded by notmuch the first > time any notmuch-related commands are invoked by the user. This is how my own configuration is stored (in ~/.notmuch.el). > I?ll close with an example of a nice feature that message mode has > (which I?ve been really wanting since the reply keybindings changed) > that notmuch would get for free if it hooked into message mode better: > the function message-widen-reply takes a reply-to-sender message and > makes it reply-to-all. That would require a bunch of work on our side to prepare the data that message-mode uses, but would indeed be nice. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120120/fa81dd67/attachment.pgp>