On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:13:49 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:35:01 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon at MIT.EDU> > wrote: > > Shouldn't we only be doing this for parts with inline (or not > > attachment) content-disposition? That's cheap to check. Or do we > > actually want things like image attachments to get inlined, despite > > their disposition? > > This is a good question, actually. Should we just always ignore the > disposition, and inline stuff if it's inlinable? Should this be > configurable?
We shouldn't inline things unless the content disposition is 'inline'. I'll work on a fix for this, which will have nothing to do with whether or not things are indexed. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120123/c6322f92/attachment.pgp>
