On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:25:19 +0000, David Edmondson <dme at dme.org> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:46:57 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at > finestructure.net> wrote: > > Is there a reason it's really necessary to make this change? Can't > > callers just ignore the returned button if they don't care about it > > further? I can see that maybe it's nice to be able to specify > > parameters at creation time, but I'm not sure why that requires throwing > > out the returned object as well. > > Patches 2 and 3 in that series can result in the button not being > inserted.
Can patches 2 and 3 be rewritten so they are compatible with the button being returned by the button creation function? jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120124/3ab2fc6b/attachment-0001.pgp>
