On Tue, Sep 04 2012, Michal Sojka <sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26 2012, Michal Sojka wrote: >> When one wants to customize the format of reply message, there nothing >> to tell the user how to do it. Without knowing that construction of >> reply buffer is actually implemented in the message package, it seems >> that replying cannot be customized. >> >> Because I was getting annoyed by the empty line the between citation >> line and the quoted message, I figured out that changing this is fairly >> easy when one knows what to customize. >> >> This patch adds notmuch-reply customization group that that contains >> references to the relevant customization options. The new group is easy >> to find as it is shown as a result of running "M-x customize-group RET >> notmuch RET". > > Ping. > > Any objections against applying?
Nobody dares to say anything due to infamiliriaty of this spesific case ;/. I could not find any reference this has been made before. I could not find any discussion about this issue. With little effort I could not extract the customization tree to stdout I could have attempted to grep whether there is same variable in many groups. The code in custom.el & cus-edit.el is so complex I could not figure out whether there is any problems having variable in many groups (put apparently the changed variable is not written twice to the customization block). I do like the feature but with this knowledge I have I just cannot promote applying (I sure am not against :) > -Michal Tomi