Mark Walters <markwalters1009 at gmail.com> writes: > + (cond ((eq major-mode 'notmuch-show-mode) > + (notmuch-show-get-message-properties)) > + ((eq major-mode 'notmuch-tree-mode) > + (notmuch-tree-get-message-properties))))
I see this already existed, but it looks weird to me to have a two test cond with no else. Is it intentional to have the code drop through and do nothing if neither case matches? It seems like it might be better to signal an error. d
