The reply-to munging code might behave differently whether there's an exact match on the strings or not, or whether the string is a raw addr-spec instead of an name-addr. These tests cover those variations (i also had to tweak json output further below when this new test was added). --- test/T220-reply.sh | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/test/T220-reply.sh b/test/T220-reply.sh index c29a900f..4fb67ffb 100755 --- a/test/T220-reply.sh +++ b/test/T220-reply.sh @@ -133,6 +133,44 @@ On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000, Sender <sen...@example.com> wrote: > Un-munging Reply-To OK" +test_begin_subtest "Un-munging Reply-To With Exact Match" +add_message '[from]="Sender <sen...@example.com>"' \ + '[to]="Some List <l...@example.com>"' \ + [subject]=notmuch-reply-test \ + '[date]="Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000"' \ + '[body]="Un-munging Reply-To"' \ + '[reply-to]="Some List <l...@example.com>"' + +output=$(notmuch reply id:${gen_msg_id} 2>&1 && echo OK) +test_expect_equal "$output" "From: Notmuch Test Suite <test_su...@notmuchmail.org> +Subject: Re: notmuch-reply-test +To: Sender <sen...@example.com>, Some List <l...@example.com> +In-Reply-To: <${gen_msg_id}> +References: <${gen_msg_id}> + +On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000, Sender <sen...@example.com> wrote: +> Un-munging Reply-To +OK" + +test_begin_subtest "Un-munging Reply-To With Raw addr-spec" +add_message '[from]="Sender <sen...@example.com>"' \ + '[to]="Some List <l...@example.com>"' \ + [subject]=notmuch-reply-test \ + '[date]="Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000"' \ + '[body]="Un-munging Reply-To"' \ + '[reply-to]="l...@example.com"' + +output=$(notmuch reply id:${gen_msg_id} 2>&1 && echo OK) +test_expect_equal "$output" "From: Notmuch Test Suite <test_su...@notmuchmail.org> +Subject: Re: notmuch-reply-test +To: Sender <sen...@example.com>, Some List <l...@example.com> +In-Reply-To: <${gen_msg_id}> +References: <${gen_msg_id}> + +On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000, Sender <sen...@example.com> wrote: +> Un-munging Reply-To +OK" + test_begin_subtest "Message with header of exactly 200 bytes" add_message '[subject]="This subject is exactly 200 bytes in length. Other than its length there is not much of note here. Note that the length of 200 bytes includes the Subject: and Re: prefixes with two spaces"' \ '[date]="Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000"' \ @@ -241,7 +279,7 @@ test_expect_equal_json "$output" ' ], "date_relative": "2010-01-05", "excluded": false, - "filename": ["'${MAIL_DIR}'/msg-012"], + "filename": ["'${MAIL_DIR}'/msg-014"], "headers": { "Date": "Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 +0000", "From": "\u2603 <snow...@example.com>", -- 2.13.2 _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch